Specialization, Trade-offs and Comparative Advantage in Kenya and Sri Lanka Trade. Here are some hypothetical numbers used to illustrate the ideas of trade-offs, specialization, and comparative advantage. Assume that using all its resources efficiently, Sri Lanka can produce either 1,000 bags of rice OR 3,000 bags of tea. Let’s also assume that, using all her […]
Here are some hypothetical numbers used to illustrate the ideas of trade-offs, specialization, and comparative advantage. Assume that using all its resources efficiently, Sri Lanka can produce either 1,000 bags of rice OR 3,000 bags of tea. Let's also assume that, using all her resources efficiently, Kenya can produce either 1,000 bags of rice OR 1,000 bags of tea. Further, assume that the countries have similar resource endowments and that they are not trading with each other initially. Therefore, each country has to produce rice and tea for its citizens. Suppose that, in the no-trade situation, Sri Lanka was consuming 400 bags of rice and 1,800 bags of tea; in the no-trade situation, Kenya was consuming 500 bags of rice and 500 bags of tea.
Now, let's play a fun game called the "Trading Game" to figure out whether these two countries have any benefit (in terms of increased consumption possibilities) if they trade with each other. You are given the following information to start the "Trading Game." The trading price is set at one bag of rice for two bags of tea, and Kenya wishes to keep at least 550 bags of rice after the trade.
Apply your knowledge of opportunity cost to identify the comparative advantage enjoyed by each country. Using your knowledge of specialization and trade, show in a multi-paragraph essay that the two countries can benefit by consuming more of both goods after the trade.
Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support your ideas and which clearly communicates the required message to your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner as appropriate for the genre of writing. Use well-structured sentences, audience-appropriate language, and correct conventions of standard American English.
Today, international trade, either bilateral or multilateral, has become widespread. The trade-off is founded on both specialization and comparative advantage. In this case, comparative advantage, which is the capacity of a country to produce a specific good or service at a relatively lower opportunity cost, leads to specialization (Amadeo). Resource endowments are the foundation of trade-offs, specialization, and comparative advantage, which explains why a bilateral trade between Kenya and Sri Lanka can be essential.
Assuming that the countries have similar resource endowments, they can engage in trade since their consumption differs. The following table offers a quick snapshot of the resource endowments and consumption.
1 bag of rice= 2 bags of tea; Kenya must retain 550 bags of rice after the trade.
Considering the volume of production, it is apparent that both countries can produce rice, but concerning tea, Sri Lanka has a higher capacity. From what it makes, Sri Lanka consumes, and it is left with a balance of 600 bags of rice and 1200 bags of tea. Kenya, in contrast, is left with 500 bags of rice and 500 bags of tea. After the trade, Kenya must retain 550 bags of rice. Note the Balance after local consumption is what is available for trade. Given that 1 bag of rice is equivalent to 2 bags of tea, it is manifest that Sri Lanka still has a comparative advantage in selling tea that is left after domestic consumption.
Kenya cannot sell rice since the Balance left is less than what it wishes to retain. It, thus, has to buy rice from Sri Lanka. On the other hand, Sri Lanka has an excess of 1200 bags of tea (equivalent to 600 bags of rice) that are unconsumed. It can also sell them to Kenya, a country with relatively low tea consumption. This trade-off means that in producing rice and tea, Sri Lanka is in a better position due to low opportunity costs; this could be due to embracing technology in production. The trade could boost the demand of Kenya’s economy.
Works Cited
Amadeo, Kimberly. “Understanding Comparative Advantage.” The Balance, 11 Oct. 2006, www.thebalance.com/comparative-advantage-3305915. Accessed 6 Feb. 2019.
Customer's Feedback Review
Published On: 07-02-2019
Thanks for your feedback! I'm glad I met all your requirements. Feel free to request me for your future orders!
Access to the order has been disabled by the author