The wave of feminism Research Paper Prompt Did the 4 waves of feminism shape women’s rights? What is the theory and history of the 4 waves of feminism? What were the outcomes? How it started. The setbacks. The movements. Current movements. Expected future movements. Etc. Instructions: Create a strong thesis. Add statistics. In-text citation (include […]
The word feminism has been synonymous with advocacy for women’s rights, with support from both genders to achieve equality. For more than a century, the movement has metamorphosed, entrenching itself toward defining women’s roles in the social, economic, and political arena. The primary goal of feminism throughout this time has been the achievement of equality for both sexes through the establishment of ideologies that create equal opportunities. However, to meet their goals, various feminist groups use different approaches in response to changing trends, times, and awareness. These approaches are known as waves, so there were four crucial periods when feminists tried to achieve equality through their movements around the world. The theory and history behind the four waves of feminism necessitate exploration since all of them had experienced setbacks. At the same time, their outcomes might help project how modern and post-modern feminist movements will continue to fight for women’s rights.
In general, feminism developed in four waves at different periods. Feminism refers to a movement that aims at ending oppression, sexism, oppression, and sexist exploitation of women (Hooks, 2014). Thus, the first wave of this movement focused primarily on overcoming legal gender-based inequality and suffrage. The origins of this movement could be traced back to Mary Wollstonecraft through her work Vindications of the Rights of Women since she was the first among many other writers whose work would define the new age of feminist activism in Great Britain (Wrye, 2009). By the 1850s, a dire need emerged to address women’s issues. A census of 1851 showed that 30% of women were unmarried, and due to society’s attitude towards work, such women were more likely to face economic hardships (DeFonza, n.d.). In the USA, the Seneca Falls convention in 1848 heralded the start of the feministic movement. At the time, such activists as Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Stanton spearheaded the fight for the right of women to vote.
The second-wave feminism aimed at expanding the issues addressed in the first-wave by discussing sexuality, workplace, family, official legal inequalities, de facto inequalities, and reproductive rights. The campaign brought various issues related to marital rape, women’s shelter, domestic violence, and rape crisis centers (Davis, 2017). The second-wave movement era started in the 1940s and ended in the early 1980s. Despite its slow start, the movement gained momentum, and by the late 1960s, a distinct campaign emerged that bundled feminists’ ideologies strategically and philosophically. Nevertheless, white feminists’ goals differed from those of people of color, namely welfare rights and liberation (Valk, 2008). These differences led to a schism in ideals between black and white feminists and Third World feminist movements. These divergent views enabled the campaign to evolve in the 1960s and 1970s, with multiple ideas, people, and issues incorporating themselves into the holistic broader agenda of female liberation (Valk, 2008). Eventually, these groups formed an all-inclusive feminist movement that advocated a change in society through either liberal or radical means.
The third wave of feminism began in the mid-1990s, intending to continue the unfinished work of the second wave and redefine what it meant to be a feminist (Evans, 2015). The starting point of this movement was the ‘riot grrrl’ in Olympia, Washington; arguably, this term was coined by Rebecca Walker in response to Thomas’s appointment to Supreme Court. At this time, the word ‘intersectionality’ came into use to describe how power structures impacted the less able in society (Cooper, 2016). Other notions attributed to this era included vegetarian ecofeminism, post-modern feminism, sex positivity, and transfeminism.
Currently, feminism is in its fourth wave. Around 2012, the movement resurged, but this time, social media began playing an important role in the fight for women’s rights (Chamberlain, 2017). By 2005, journalist Pythia Peay advocated a fourth-wave movement focused on civil rights and social justice. Since then, such organizations and events as UK Feminista, One Billion Rising, Everyday Sexism Project, and #MeToo movements have tried to address their agendas. A British feminist writer Laura Bates introduced the Everyday Sexism Project, an online forum aimed at women who would post their everyday experiences of harassment (Aitkenhead, 2014). The focal point of fourth-wave feminism includes campus sexual assault, workplace harassment, and rape culture.
In tracing the psychoanalytic perspective of the four waves of feminism, one might see a defined timeline encompassing an established line of thought and strategy that had helped shape women’s rights. The success of these waves was achieved gradually, with feminists dealing with the problems of their times and lobbying for solutions. The first wave of feminism in the early 20th century achieved women’s right to vote; arguably, a lobby group succeeded in driving this change. The second wave focused mainly on the sociopolitical-cultural aspect of feminism evolution, specifically raising awareness of women’s liberation and gender issues. The third wave achieved considerable success in convincing women that they could combine sex, career, and motherhood without the need to sacrifice anything. Finally, the fourth wave focused on the spiritual concerns of the world and all people by dealing with the issues of the environment (Wrye, 2009). Therefore, all four waves of feminism have contributed to shaping women’s rights as they are today.
The Outcomes of Feminism Through the Years
In the first wave, some US states passed reforms allowing women to vote. For example, Wyoming and Utah moved the motion to make women’s voting right law in 1869 and 1870, respectively. Still, most states waited until 1920, when the 19th Amendment became a part of the constitution, thus prohibiting gender-based voting and restrictions by the government (DeFonza, n.d.). Traditionally, women worked only in the areas that society perceived appropriate for them, such as teaching, nursing, philanthropy, and working on school boards (DeFonza, n.d.). The first wave of feminism opened clerical work in the government and medicine for them. The second-wave movement partly achieved equal education, pay, and education, free contraceptives, 24-hour nurseries, and abortion on demand. The third wave used the issues raised by the second one, and considerable success was achieved in gaining equal access to public education, discussion on women’s abuse and rape, child-care services, women’s studies programs, funding for young women, and so on.
Moreover, feminists of color were included in the broader movement as the intersection of gender and race gained more prominence. Finally, the era of social media helped propel the movement to new heights in its fourth wave. Therefore, much has been achieved in the world’s struggle for women’s liberation.
During its history, feminism has experienced plenty of setbacks. For example, the first wave was plagued by a lack of consideration in liberating women of color in their struggle for socioeconomic status since only white; middle-class women dictated what other women should correspond to. This criticism re-emerged in the next wave of this movement, with whites ignoring the needs of other races since the most influential feminist leaders at the time were white, middle-aged women who suppressed the needs of others (Blackwell, 2011). The third wave of feminists lacked cohesion due to the absence of cause and immaturity in their ideologies. The latter viewpoint emerged due to the subjective nature that this generation attributed to autonomy and empowerment (Newman & White, 2017). Finally, the criticism against fourth-wave feminists include their reliance on technology, their disproportionate ownership and access to media outlets, and their preference for only those who know how to use the technology (Jóns & Furuyama, 2013). At the same time, the ‘mean girl’ atmosphere has been noticed to pit women against each other, with some feminists being hostile to those who adhere to their cause (Simpkins, 2014). Therefore, every wave had challenges that slowed down the progress of the feminist agenda. Still, these challenges would only enable future generations to avoid such traps.
One of the movement’s occurrences, instrumental in changing the dynamics of the first-wave popularity, was the Langham Place circle, comprised of white, middle-aged females who exchanged views and published scholarly work on women’s rights. This group inspired such works as The English Woman’s Journal, Women and Work, and Remarks on the Education of Girls and founded the Society for Promoting Employment of Women (Wrye, 2009). In the other three waves, the movements that had shaped feminism of their times comprised students, civil rights activists, and the antiwar movement (Valk, 2008). Additionally, several groups were involved in feminist issues, ranging from black women and Third World countries to white feminists. Still, these groups fell into one of two categories, namely liberal and radical feminists. The former worked by prioritizing statutory and legal reforms and sexual equality while putting faith in America’s political and economic institutions. The radicals focused on ending male supremacy by targeting America’s economic and political might and creating a democracy that would be inclusive by equally representing every member of society.
The trend toward women’s liberation from oppression has been mostly positive. The four waves of feminism led to an upward trend in women’s employability, with an employment rate of 54% in the USA by 2016, while 61% of women across the world believed, either wholly or partially, that they had full equality with men (Statista, n.d.). Similarly, 68% of all people surveyed in 24 countries advocated equal opportunities for women in their nations (Statista, n.d.). Nevertheless, according to a survey in 2017, 72% of the people from 15 countries believed that there was still inequality between the sexes regarding economic rights (Statista, n.d.). These data show that although much has been achieved regarding feminism worldwide, some areas still need improvement for the world to attain true equality. With more groups seeking equality in the structures of modern-day society, future feminist movements will incorporate these needs into their agendas. For long, waves of feminists have ignored the needs of women of color to be included in their organizations since their decisions in policymaking were biased, favoring only white women. Therefore, future feminist groups will incorporate many cultures and groups, eventually discovering more areas where women are still oppressed and expanding the scope of the movement to be inclusive of all of them.
The four waves of feminism have tried to address the inequalities between the sexes and achieved much. Over the years, feminists’ approaches have improved women’s social, political, and economic conditions worldwide. The feminist movement would not have succeeded as much as it had, were it not for the lobbyist groups that had aided their cause. The fraternization between women’s groups and other activists enabled the change in the landscape of freedom for them. The four waves of feminism contributed significantly to the present-day movements, with great success in the fight for voting rights, education, career, marriages, and economic viability. Despite some setbacks, the benefits for women worldwide cannot be understated. Therefore, feminism is considered to be a great step forward since people have been able to achieve gender integration into the social structure, which has been beneficial for everyone.
Aitkenhead, D. (2014, January 24). Laura Bates interview: ‘Two years ago, I didn’t know what feminism meant.’ The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/24/laura-bates-interview-everyday-sexism
Blackwell, M. (2011). Chicana power!: Contested histories of feminism in the Chicano movement. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Chamberlain, P. (2018). Feminist fourth wave: Affective temporality. London, UK: Springer International Publishing.
Cooper, B. (2016). Intersectionality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 385-405). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Davis, J. C. (2017). From head shops to whole foods: The rise and fall of activist entrepreneurs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Evans, E. (2015). The politics of third wave feminisms: Neoliberalism, intersectionality, and the state in Britain and the US. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hooks, B. (2014). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge
Newman, J. A., & White, L. A. (2012). Women, politics, and public policy: The political struggles of Canadian women (2nd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Simpkins, J. (2014, March 21). “You can’t sit with us!” – How fourth-wave feminism became ‘mean girls.’ HuffPost. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jennifer-simpkins/feminism-fourth-wave-became-mean-girls_b_4616597.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_us=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnLw&guce_referrer_cs=eh8zKkC8qTaTS9lIFD8IXw
Statista. (n.d.). Women – Statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/1269/women/
Wrye, H. K. (2009). The fourth wave of feminism: Psychoanalytic perspectives introductory remarks. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 10(4), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240650903227999
Valk, A. M. (2008). Radical sisters: Second-wave feminism and black liberation in Washington, DC. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Customer's Feedback Review
Published On: 01-01-1970