Read the Case Study “Case Q, Whose Hospital” and check the following arguments for and against the CEO. Rebuttals Wherry defended himself by reminding those in attendance that: He has identified and acted on bad leadership and low morale in the nursing department. He is working hard on improving finances. He has improved relations with […]
Case Q, Whose Hospital Case Study
The board was justified in raising a vote of no confidence against Don Wherry’s malpractice. As the organization’s chief executive officer, Wherry ought to have acted responsibly and demonstrated leadership competency to promote productivity in the organization. In contrast, Wherry’s leadership was characterized by poor communication, lack of follow-up, and negligence. He was also identified as incompetent and devious, who overlooked other people’s interests in the organization. Poor leadership constitutes a risk factor to organizational performance as it may cause a decline in the level of motivation among the workforce (Barnes & Spangenburg, 2018, p. 49). Therefore, the board was justified in demanding Wherry’s resignation from office.
To avoid being fired, Wherry should have completed his duties diligently and stimulated hard work and commitment among the organization’s staff members. As an organizational leader, Wherry ought to have completed his role of setting a clear vision for the organization, motivating workforce members, guiding employees through the work process, and building morale within the organization. After identifying his mistakes and failures, Wherry ought to have acted on his bad leadership strategies and improved morale among members of the nursing department. He could also have worked hard to improve financial management and addressed malpractice claims to avoid disciplinary action by the board members. In such a situation, the medical board could have considered offering him an opportunity to do better.
Wherry should have resigned as the board wished him to. Although quitting his job could have been a potentially difficult decision for him, Wherry ought to have resigned from office to avoid further disciplinary confrontations by the board members. According to Dunn (2018), leaving a position is often a good decision if it makes a person feel happier, healthier, and more aligned with their goals, priorities, and values. Leaving his position could have attracted several benefits to his professional life as he would be more capable of assuming new career roles aligned with his goals, values, and capabilities.
Barnes, L. L., & Spangenburg, J. M. (2018). When Leadership Fails–A View from the Lens of Four Employees. American Journal of Business Education, 11(3), 49-54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185098
Dunn, A. H. (2018). Leaving a profession after it’s left you: Teachers’ public resignation letters as resistance amidst neoliberalism. Teachers College Record, 120(9), 1-34. https://www.tcrecord.org/LIBRARY/exec.asp?ContentID=22107
Customer's Feedback Review
Published On: 01-01-1970